עברית English

User f241ed0d9183160bf8889b0b1fc5b8d7 Responses

← Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 111

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated (Target Decreases)Distributed (Target Increases) View Response
f241ed0d9... f241ed0d9183160bf8889b0b1fc5b8d7 14-07-2026 08:04 38s [50, 20, 30] 66.7%33.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 146

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget l1leontief View Response
f241ed0d9... f241ed0d9183160bf8889b0b1fc5b8d7 21-01-2026 19:31 N/A [50, 10, 10, 10, 20] 0%0% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 179

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated (Target Decreases)Distributed (Target Increases) View Response
f241ed0d9... f241ed0d9183160bf8889b0b1fc5b8d7 20-07-2026 18:55 35s [50, 20, 20, 10] 0%0% View Response

User ID: f241ed0d9183160bf8889b0b1fc5b8d7

Survey ID: 111

Ideal budget: [50, 20, 30]
⏱️ Response Time: 38s

Asymmetric Loss Distribution Matrix

Magnitude Levels (X = base_unit × multiplier)
Target CategoryX=2X=4X=6X=8%
Category 00%
Category 1100%
Category 2100%
Total67%67%67%67%67%
Legend
Concentrated decrease in the target project (entire decrease from target; the other two increase equally)
Distributed decrease across the other two projects (split evenly; target increases)
Cell shows a single choice at that magnitude. Blue = concentrated decrease in the target; Orange = decrease split evenly across the other two (target increases).
Type A: 12Type B: 0
Pairs List
Pair #1 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[46, 22, 32] Decrease target by 4
✓ [54, 18, 28] Increase target by 4
Pair #2 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[42, 24, 34] Decrease target by 8
✓ [58, 16, 26] Increase target by 8
Pair #3 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[38, 26, 36] Decrease target by 12
✓ [62, 14, 24] Increase target by 12
Pair #4 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[34, 28, 38] Decrease target by 16
✓ [66, 12, 22] Increase target by 16
Pair #5 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [52, 16, 32] Decrease target by 4
[48, 24, 28] Increase target by 4
Pair #6 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [54, 12, 34] Decrease target by 8
[46, 28, 26] Increase target by 8
Pair #7 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [56, 8, 36] Decrease target by 12
[44, 32, 24] Increase target by 12
Pair #8 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [58, 4, 38] Decrease target by 16
[42, 36, 22] Increase target by 16
Pair #9 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [52, 22, 26] Decrease target by 4
[48, 18, 34] Increase target by 4
Pair #10 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [54, 24, 22] Decrease target by 8
[46, 16, 38] Increase target by 8
Pair #11 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [56, 26, 18] Decrease target by 12
[44, 14, 42] Increase target by 12
Pair #12 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [58, 28, 14] Decrease target by 16
[42, 12, 46] Increase target by 16

Survey ID: 146

Ideal budget: [50, 10, 10, 10, 20]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
l1 (Rank) 0%
leontief (Rank) 100%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 25, 20, 15, 25] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 20, 20, 30, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 30, 20, 15, 20] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 25, 20, 25, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 25, 15, 10, 35] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 50, 10, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 15, 15, 35, 20] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 35, 15, 20, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 30, 10, 10, 35] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 25, 35, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 25, 15, 20, 25] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 10, 20, 40, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 10, 25, 20, 30] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 30, 20, 20, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 20, 10, 25, 30] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 15, 10, 45, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 40, 10, 15, 20] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 10, 25, 35, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 20, 25, 20, 20] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
✓ [20, 25, 15, 30, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.30}

Survey ID: 179

Ideal budget: [50, 20, 20, 10]
⏱️ Response Time: 35s

Asymmetric Loss Distribution Matrix

Magnitude Levels (X = base_unit × multiplier)
Target CategoryX=35%
Category 0100%
Category 1–0%
Category 2–0%
Total100%100%
Legend
Concentrated decrease in the target project (entire decrease from target; the other two increase equally)
Distributed decrease across the other two projects (split evenly; target increases)
Cell shows a single choice at that magnitude. Blue = concentrated decrease in the target; Orange = decrease split evenly across the other two (target increases).
Type A: 0Type B: 10
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 50, 10, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 45, 10, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.72, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 40, 10, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.72, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 35, 10, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 40, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.72, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 35, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 50, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 45, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.72, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 30, 10, 40] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.69, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 30, 40] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.69, worst: 0.62}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}