עברית English

User ef6a8691147f759e9219464506d42633 Responses

← Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 116

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
ef6a86911... ef6a8691147f759e9219464506d42633 15-07-2026 18:03 167s [50, 30, 20] 50%50%50% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 179

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
ef6a86911... ef6a8691147f759e9219464506d42633 20-07-2026 19:04 61s [40, 25, 25, 10] 0%0%0% View Response

User ID: ef6a8691147f759e9219464506d42633

Survey ID: 116

Ideal budget: [50, 30, 20]
⏱️ Response Time: 167s

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [60, 40, 0]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [60, 30, 10]
Year 2: [50, 40, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [40, 20, 40]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [50, 20, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [30, 40, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [40, 30, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [70, 20, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
✓
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [60, 30, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [60, 10, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [60, 20, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [40, 50, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [40, 40, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [55, 35, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
Year 1: [55, 30, 15]
Year 2: [50, 35, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [45, 25, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [45, 30, 25]
Year 2: [50, 25, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [40, 35, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
Year 1: [45, 35, 20]
Year 2: [45, 30, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [60, 25, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
Year 1: [55, 25, 20]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [55, 20, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 25, 25]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [45, 40, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
✓
Year 1: [50, 35, 15]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 179

Ideal budget: [40, 25, 25, 10]
⏱️ Response Time: 61s

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [60, 10, 10, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.81}
[15, 50, 25, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [65, 10, 10, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.81}
[15, 50, 25, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [55, 10, 10, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.81}
[15, 50, 25, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [65, 10, 10, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.81}
[15, 25, 50, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [55, 10, 10, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.81}
[15, 25, 50, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [60, 10, 10, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.81}
[15, 25, 50, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [55, 10, 10, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.88, worst: 0.78}
[15, 25, 25, 35] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [50, 10, 10, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.86, worst: 0.78}
[15, 25, 25, 35] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [25, 40, 10, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.78}
[15, 25, 25, 35] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [25, 45, 10, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.78}
[15, 25, 25, 35] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -60.00}