User ee8236f639a9c57336575dca74397a5a Responses

Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 113

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Consistency View Response
ee8236f63... ee8236f639a9c57336575dca74397a5a 25-09-2025 15:21 N/A [70, 15, 15] 66.7% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 172

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Identity ConsistencyPreferred Subject View Response
ee8236f63... ee8236f639a9c57336575dca74397a5a 09-02-2026 13:40 N/A [50, 25, 25] 90%Supporting those in need View Response

User ID: ee8236f639a9c57336575dca74397a5a

User Preference Consistency Analysis

Table: Preference A vs B
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 A > B B > A
Magnitude 0.4 A > B B > A
Col. Cons. Final Score: 0
Table: Preference A vs C
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 A > C A > C
Magnitude 0.4 A > C A > C
Col. Cons. Final Score: 1
Table: Preference B vs C
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 B > C B > C
Magnitude 0.4 B > C B > C
Col. Cons. Final Score: 1
Final Ranking Summary Table
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude X1=3 A > B > C B > A > C 2/3
Magnitude X2=6 A > B > C B > A > C 2/3
Col. Cons. 3/3 3/3 2/3
Understanding Consistency Scores

This analysis measures how consistently the user ranks the same budget subjects across different scenarios. Perfect consistency (✓) means the user always ranks subjects the same way (3/3). Partial consistency (◐) means the user shows consistency in some scenarios but varies in others (1/3 or 2/3). Failed consistency (✗) means the user's rankings vary significantly (0/3). Note: In questions with negative magnitude (Question –), user preferences are swapped to reflect the true meaning of their choices.

Perfect Consistency
Partial Consistency
Inconsistent

Survey ID: 113

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Option A 67%
Option B 33%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[76, 12, 12] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=3, positive) - Option A
[67, 21, 12] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=3, positive) - Option B
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[76, 12, 12] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=3, positive) - Option A
[67, 12, 21] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=3, positive) - Option C
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[67, 21, 12] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=3, positive) - Option B
[67, 12, 21] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=3, positive) - Option C
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[64, 18, 18] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=3, negative) - Option A
[73, 9, 18] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=3, negative) - Option B
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[64, 18, 18] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=3, negative) - Option A
[73, 18, 9] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=3, negative) - Option C
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[73, 9, 18] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=3, negative) - Option B
[73, 18, 9] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=3, negative) - Option C
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[82, 9, 9] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=6, positive) - Option A
[64, 27, 9] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=6, positive) - Option B
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[82, 9, 9] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=6, positive) - Option A
[64, 9, 27] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=6, positive) - Option C
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[64, 27, 9] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=6, positive) - Option B
[64, 9, 27] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=6, positive) - Option C
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[58, 21, 21] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=6, negative) - Option A
[76, 3, 21] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=6, negative) - Option B
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[58, 21, 21] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=6, negative) - Option A
[76, 21, 3] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=6, negative) - Option C
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[76, 3, 21] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=6, negative) - Option B
[76, 21, 3] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=6, negative) - Option C

Identity Asymmetry Analysis

Identity Consistency: 90.0%

Dominant Preference: Supporting those in need

Pain Curve
Step Magnitude Preferred Subject
1 2 Supporting those in need
2 5 Supporting those in need
3 8 Supporting those in need
4 10 Cultural events
5 12 Supporting those in need
6 15 Supporting those in need
7 18 Supporting those in need
8 20 Supporting those in need
9 22 Supporting those in need
10 25 Supporting those in need

Survey ID: 172

Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 23, 27] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 27, 23] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 20, 30] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 30, 20] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 17, 33] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 33, 17] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 15, 35] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 35, 15] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 13, 37] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 37, 13] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 10, 40] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 40, 10] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 7, 43] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 43, 7] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 5, 45] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 45, 5] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 3, 47] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 47, 3] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 0, 50] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[50, 50, 0] מעדיף את סיוע לנזקקים