User dc32337da9b09778b0beb2a207cb4894 Responses

Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 110

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated (Target Decreases)Distributed (Target Increases) View Response
dc32337da... dc32337da9b09778b0beb2a207cb4894 21-09-2025 17:50 N/A [60, 20, 20] 66.7%33.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 117

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
dc32337da... dc32337da9b09778b0beb2a207cb4894 21-12-2025 11:39 N/A [60, 20, 20] 16.7%83.3%83.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 142

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget l2leontief View Response
dc32337da... dc32337da9b09778b0beb2a207cb4894 13-07-2026 08:34 113s [30, 30, 20, 20] 0%0% View Response

User ID: dc32337da9b09778b0beb2a207cb4894

Survey ID: 110

Asymmetric Loss Distribution Matrix

Magnitude Levels (X = base_unit × multiplier)
Target CategoryX=2X=4X=6X=8%
Category 0100%
Category 10%
Category 2100%
Total67%67%67%67%67%
Legend
Concentrated decrease in the target project (entire decrease from target; the other two increase equally)
Distributed decrease across the other two projects (split evenly; target increases)
Cell shows a single choice at that magnitude. Blue = concentrated decrease in the target; Orange = decrease split evenly across the other two (target increases).
Type A: 12Type B: 0
Pairs List
Pair #1 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[56, 22, 22] Decrease target by 4
[64, 18, 18] Increase target by 4
Pair #2 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[52, 24, 24] Decrease target by 8
[68, 16, 16] Increase target by 8
Pair #3 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[48, 26, 26] Decrease target by 12
[72, 14, 14] Increase target by 12
Pair #4 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[44, 28, 28] Decrease target by 16
[76, 12, 12] Increase target by 16
Pair #5 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[62, 16, 22] Decrease target by 4
[58, 24, 18] Increase target by 4
Pair #6 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[64, 12, 24] Decrease target by 8
[56, 28, 16] Increase target by 8
Pair #7 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[66, 8, 26] Decrease target by 12
[54, 32, 14] Increase target by 12
Pair #8 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[68, 4, 28] Decrease target by 16
[52, 36, 12] Increase target by 16
Pair #9 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[62, 22, 16] Decrease target by 4
[58, 18, 24] Increase target by 4
Pair #10 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[64, 24, 12] Decrease target by 8
[56, 16, 28] Increase target by 8
Pair #11 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[66, 26, 8] Decrease target by 12
[54, 14, 32] Increase target by 12
Pair #12 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[68, 28, 4] Decrease target by 16
[52, 12, 36] Increase target by 16

Survey ID: 117

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
16.7% 83.3% 83.3%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [70, 30, 0]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
Year 1: [70, 20, 10]
Year 2: [60, 30, 10]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [50, 10, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [60, 10, 30]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [40, 30, 30]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [50, 20, 30]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [80, 10, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
Year 1: [70, 10, 20]
Year 2: [70, 20, 10]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [70, 0, 30]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
Year 1: [60, 10, 30]
Year 2: [70, 10, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [50, 40, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
Year 1: [60, 30, 10]
Year 2: [50, 30, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [70, 25, 5]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
Year 1: [70, 20, 10]
Year 2: [60, 25, 15]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [50, 15, 35]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [60, 15, 25]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [45, 30, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [55, 20, 25]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [75, 10, 15]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
Year 1: [70, 10, 20]
Year 2: [65, 20, 15]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [65, 5, 30]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [60, 10, 30]
Year 2: [65, 15, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [55, 35, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
Year 1: [60, 30, 10]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 142

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
l2 (Rank) 70%
leontief (Rank) 30%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[45, 10, 20, 25] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -40.62}
[15, 65, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[45, 10, 25, 20] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -40.62}
[15, 65, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 10, 20, 35] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -40.62}
[15, 65, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 10, 25, 30] l2: {best: -23.45, worst: -40.62}
[15, 65, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 10, 30, 25] l2: {best: -23.45, worst: -40.62}
[15, 65, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 35, 20, 35] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -41.23}
[15, 15, 15, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 35, 20, 35] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -41.23}
[15, 15, 55, 15] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 35, 20, 35] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -46.37}
[15, 15, 60, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 35, 20, 35] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -40.62}
[15, 20, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 10, 35, 20] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -40.62}
[15, 65, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}