עברית English

User d02360eefae5de5250a3c1625f1c3317 Responses

← Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 116

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
d02360eef... d02360eefae5de5250a3c1625f1c3317 15-12-2025 13:16 N/A [40, 30, 30] 8.3%91.7%91.7% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 117

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
d02360eef... d02360eefae5de5250a3c1625f1c3317 15-12-2025 17:03 N/A [60, 20, 20] 16.7%83.3%83.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 124

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget klanti_leontief View Response
d02360eef... d02360eefae5de5250a3c1625f1c3317 19-01-2026 12:32 N/A [40, 30, 30] 0%0% View Response

User ID: d02360eefae5de5250a3c1625f1c3317

Survey ID: 116

Ideal budget: [40, 30, 30]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
8.3% 91.7% 91.7%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [45, 40, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [45, 30, 25]
Year 2: [40, 40, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [35, 20, 45]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [35, 30, 35]
Year 2: [40, 20, 40]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [25, 35, 40]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
✓
Year 1: [35, 35, 30]
Year 2: [30, 30, 40]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
✓
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [50, 30, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [50, 15, 35]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 25, 35]
Year 2: [50, 20, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [30, 45, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 35, 25]
Year 2: [30, 40, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [55, 45, 0]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
✓
Year 1: [55, 30, 15]
Year 2: [40, 45, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [25, 15, 60]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [25, 30, 45]
Year 2: [40, 15, 45]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [10, 45, 45]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
✓
Year 1: [25, 45, 30]
Year 2: [25, 30, 45]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [70, 15, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
✓
Year 1: [55, 15, 30]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [55, 0, 45]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 15, 45]
Year 2: [55, 15, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [25, 60, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 45, 15]
Year 2: [25, 45, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 117

Ideal budget: [60, 20, 20]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
16.7% 83.3% 83.3%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [65, 25, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [65, 20, 15]
Year 2: [60, 25, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [55, 15, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [55, 20, 25]
Year 2: [60, 15, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [50, 25, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [55, 25, 20]
Year 2: [55, 20, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [70, 15, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
✓
Year 1: [65, 15, 20]
Year 2: [65, 20, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [65, 10, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [60, 15, 25]
Year 2: [65, 15, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
Year 1: [60, 25, 15]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [65, 30, 5]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
✓
Year 1: [65, 20, 15]
Year 2: [60, 30, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [55, 10, 35]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
✓
Year 1: [55, 20, 25]
Year 2: [60, 10, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [45, 25, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
✓
Year 1: [55, 25, 20]
Year 2: [50, 20, 30]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [75, 15, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
✓
Year 1: [65, 15, 20]
Year 2: [70, 20, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [70, 5, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
✓
Year 1: [60, 15, 25]
Year 2: [70, 10, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [50, 35, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
✓
Year 1: [60, 25, 15]
Year 2: [50, 30, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 124

Ideal budget: [40, 30, 30]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
kl (Rank) 70%
anti_leontief (Rank) 30%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.31
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 55, 25] kl: {best: -0.15, worst: -0.31}
[10, 45, 45] anti_leontief: {best: -1.50, worst: -1.83}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.24
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [25, 60, 15] kl: {best: -0.19, worst: -0.31}
[10, 50, 40] anti_leontief: {best: -1.67, worst: -2.00}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.24
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [25, 15, 60] kl: {best: -0.19, worst: -0.31}
[10, 40, 50] anti_leontief: {best: -1.67, worst: -2.00}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.21
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[30, 50, 20] kl: {best: -0.08, worst: -0.16}
✓ [55, 10, 35] anti_leontief: {best: -1.38, worst: -1.67}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.21
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [30, 20, 50] kl: {best: -0.08, worst: -0.16}
[55, 35, 10] anti_leontief: {best: -1.38, worst: -1.67}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[25, 45, 30] kl: {best: -0.07, worst: -0.15}
✓ [50, 10, 40] anti_leontief: {best: -1.33, worst: -1.50}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [60, 20, 20] kl: {best: -0.08, worst: -0.15}
[50, 40, 10] anti_leontief: {best: -1.33, worst: -1.50}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.19
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [30, 45, 25] kl: {best: -0.05, worst: -0.10}
[20, 40, 40] anti_leontief: {best: -1.33, worst: -1.50}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.18
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [25, 20, 55] kl: {best: -0.13, worst: -0.19}
[65, 25, 10] anti_leontief: {best: -1.62, worst: -1.83}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.18
Score = min(KL advantage, Anti Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[25, 55, 20] kl: {best: -0.13, worst: -0.19}
✓ [65, 10, 25] anti_leontief: {best: -1.62, worst: -1.83}