עברית English

User c8b0c37560c48fcae4eb2cb330081c03 Responses

← Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 111

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated (Target Decreases)Distributed (Target Increases) View Response
c8b0c3756... c8b0c37560c48fcae4eb2cb330081c03 25-09-2025 11:04 N/A [50, 20, 30] 50%50% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 140

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget l1leontief View Response
c8b0c3756... c8b0c37560c48fcae4eb2cb330081c03 21-01-2026 15:19 N/A [45, 25, 30] 0%0% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 171

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Identity ConsistencyPreferred Subject View Response
c8b0c3756... c8b0c37560c48fcae4eb2cb330081c03 09-02-2026 13:05 N/A [40, 15, 15, 15, 15] 60%Ministry of Health View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 179

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated (Target Decreases)Distributed (Target Increases) View Response
c8b0c3756... c8b0c37560c48fcae4eb2cb330081c03 20-07-2026 19:48 111s [45, 20, 20, 15] 0%0% View Response

User ID: c8b0c37560c48fcae4eb2cb330081c03

Survey ID: 111

Ideal budget: [50, 20, 30]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A

Asymmetric Loss Distribution Matrix

Magnitude Levels (X = base_unit × multiplier)
Target CategoryX=2X=4X=6X=8%
Category 025%
Category 125%
Category 2100%
Total67%33%67%33%50%
Legend
Concentrated decrease in the target project (entire decrease from target; the other two increase equally)
Distributed decrease across the other two projects (split evenly; target increases)
Cell shows a single choice at that magnitude. Blue = concentrated decrease in the target; Orange = decrease split evenly across the other two (target increases).
Type A: 12Type B: 0
Pairs List
Pair #1 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [46, 22, 32] Decrease target by 4
[54, 18, 28] Increase target by 4
Pair #2 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[42, 24, 34] Decrease target by 8
✓ [58, 16, 26] Increase target by 8
Pair #3 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[38, 26, 36] Decrease target by 12
✓ [62, 14, 24] Increase target by 12
Pair #4 (Target: Category 1)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[34, 28, 38] Decrease target by 16
✓ [66, 12, 22] Increase target by 16
Pair #5 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[52, 16, 32] Decrease target by 4
✓ [48, 24, 28] Increase target by 4
Pair #6 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[54, 12, 34] Decrease target by 8
✓ [46, 28, 26] Increase target by 8
Pair #7 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [56, 8, 36] Decrease target by 12
[44, 32, 24] Increase target by 12
Pair #8 (Target: Category 2)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[58, 4, 38] Decrease target by 16
✓ [42, 36, 22] Increase target by 16
Pair #9 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [52, 22, 26] Decrease target by 4
[48, 18, 34] Increase target by 4
Pair #10 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [54, 24, 22] Decrease target by 8
[46, 16, 38] Increase target by 8
Pair #11 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [56, 26, 18] Decrease target by 12
[44, 14, 42] Increase target by 12
Pair #12 (Target: Category 3)
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [58, 28, 14] Decrease target by 16
[42, 12, 46] Increase target by 16

Survey ID: 140

Ideal budget: [45, 25, 30]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
l1 (Rank) 60%
leontief (Rank) 40%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.35
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [55, 35, 10] l1: {best: -40.00, worst: -70.00}
[25, 60, 15] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.30
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[45, 10, 45] l1: {best: -30.00, worst: -50.00}
✓ [30, 50, 20] leontief: {best: 0.67, worst: 0.40}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.30
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [60, 10, 30] l1: {best: -30.00, worst: -50.00}
[30, 15, 55] leontief: {best: 0.60, worst: 0.40}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.28
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [50, 40, 10] l1: {best: -40.00, worst: -60.00}
[25, 15, 60] leontief: {best: 0.56, worst: 0.33}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.28
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[45, 45, 10] l1: {best: -40.00, worst: -60.00}
✓ [30, 55, 15] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.33}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.28
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[65, 25, 10] l1: {best: -40.00, worst: -60.00}
✓ [25, 55, 20] leontief: {best: 0.56, worst: 0.33}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.26
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [50, 10, 40] l1: {best: -30.00, worst: -50.00}
[25, 50, 25] leontief: {best: 0.56, worst: 0.40}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.26
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[55, 10, 35] l1: {best: -30.00, worst: -50.00}
✓ [25, 20, 55] leontief: {best: 0.56, worst: 0.40}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.26
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 50, 10] l1: {best: -50.00, worst: -70.00}
[20, 60, 20] leontief: {best: 0.44, worst: 0.33}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.26
Score = min(L1 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [60, 30, 10] l1: {best: -40.00, worst: -60.00}
[20, 55, 25] leontief: {best: 0.44, worst: 0.33}

Identity Asymmetry Analysis

Identity Consistency: 60.0%

Dominant Preference: Ministry of Health

Pain Curve
Step Magnitude Preferred Subject
1 2 Ministry of Education
2 3 Ministry of Education
3 4 Ministry of Education
4 6 Ministry of Education
5 8 Ministry of Health
6 9 Ministry of Health
7 10 Ministry of Health
8 12 Ministry of Health
9 14 Ministry of Health
10 15 Ministry of Health

Survey ID: 171

Ideal budget: [40, 15, 15, 15, 15]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 13, 17, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
✓ [40, 17, 13, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 12, 18, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
✓ [40, 18, 12, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 11, 19, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
✓ [40, 19, 11, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 9, 21, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
✓ [40, 21, 9, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 7, 23, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[40, 23, 7, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 6, 24, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[40, 24, 6, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 5, 25, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[40, 25, 5, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 3, 27, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[40, 27, 3, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 1, 29, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[40, 29, 1, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 0, 30, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[40, 30, 0, 15, 15] מעדיף את משרד החינוך

Survey ID: 179

Ideal budget: [45, 20, 20, 15]
⏱️ Response Time: 111s

Asymmetric Loss Distribution Matrix

Magnitude Levels (X = base_unit × multiplier)
Target CategoryX=30X=35%
Category 0100%
Category 1––0%
Category 2––0%
Total100%100%100%
Legend
Concentrated decrease in the target project (entire decrease from target; the other two increase equally)
Distributed decrease across the other two projects (split evenly; target increases)
Cell shows a single choice at that magnitude. Blue = concentrated decrease in the target; Orange = decrease split evenly across the other two (target increases).
Type A: 0Type B: 10
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 40, 10, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.78, worst: 0.70}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -60.00, worst: -70.00}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 40, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.78, worst: 0.70}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -60.00, worst: -70.00}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 35, 10, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.78, worst: 0.70}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -60.00, worst: -70.00}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 10, 35, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.78, worst: 0.70}
[15, 20, 20, 45] l1: {best: -60.00, worst: -70.00}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 40, 10, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.64}
[10, 55, 20, 15] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 45, 10, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.64}
[10, 55, 20, 15] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 10, 40, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.64}
[10, 55, 20, 15] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 10, 40, 35] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.62}
[10, 20, 20, 50] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 10, 45, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.64}
[10, 55, 20, 15] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 10, 35, 40] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.70, worst: 0.62}
[10, 20, 20, 50] l1: {best: -70.00, worst: -80.00}