עברית English

User 9b7f739f9ba1a3678e8e90bb8aa26b9d Responses

← Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 112

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Consistency View Response
9b7f739f9... 9b7f739f9ba1a3678e8e90bb8aa26b9d 25-09-2025 12:54 N/A [40, 30, 30] 100% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 117

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
9b7f739f9... 9b7f739f9ba1a3678e8e90bb8aa26b9d 21-12-2025 11:49 N/A [40, 40, 20] 16.7%83.3%83.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 142

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget l2leontief View Response
9b7f739f9... 9b7f739f9ba1a3678e8e90bb8aa26b9d 13-07-2026 09:00 108s [35, 35, 15, 15] 0%0% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 181

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget cosine_similarityleontief View Response
9b7f739f9... 9b7f739f9ba1a3678e8e90bb8aa26b9d 26-07-2026 12:45 223s [40, 25, 25, 10] 0%0% View Response

User ID: 9b7f739f9ba1a3678e8e90bb8aa26b9d

User Preference Consistency Analysis

Table: Preference A vs B
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 A > B A > B ✓
Magnitude 0.4 A > B A > B ✓
Col. Cons. ✓ ✓ Final Score: 1 ✓
Table: Preference A vs C
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 A > C A > C ✓
Magnitude 0.4 A > C A > C ✓
Col. Cons. ✓ ✓ Final Score: 1 ✓
Table: Preference B vs C
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 C > B C > B ✓
Magnitude 0.4 C > B C > B ✓
Col. Cons. ✓ ✓ Final Score: 1 ✓
Final Ranking Summary Table
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude X1=6 A > C > B A > C > B ✓ 3/3
Magnitude X2=12 A > C > B A > C > B ✓ 3/3
Col. Cons. ✓ 3/3 ✓ 3/3 ✓ 3/3
Understanding Consistency Scores

This analysis measures how consistently the user ranks the same budget subjects across different scenarios. Perfect consistency (✓) means the user always ranks subjects the same way (3/3). Partial consistency (◐) means the user shows consistency in some scenarios but varies in others (1/3 or 2/3). Failed consistency (✗) means the user's rankings vary significantly (0/3). Note: In questions with negative magnitude (Question –), user preferences are swapped to reflect the true meaning of their choices.

✓ Perfect Consistency
◐ Partial Consistency
✗ Inconsistent

Survey ID: 112

Ideal budget: [40, 30, 30]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Option A 50%
Option B 50%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [52, 24, 24] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=6, positive) - Option A
[34, 42, 24] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=6, positive) - Option B
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [52, 24, 24] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=6, positive) - Option A
[34, 24, 42] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=6, positive) - Option C
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[34, 42, 24] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=6, positive) - Option B
✓ [34, 24, 42] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=6, positive) - Option C
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[28, 36, 36] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=6, negative) - Option A
✓ [46, 18, 36] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=6, negative) - Option B
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[28, 36, 36] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=6, negative) - Option A
✓ [46, 36, 18] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=6, negative) - Option C
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [46, 18, 36] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=6, negative) - Option B
[46, 36, 18] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=6, negative) - Option C
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [64, 18, 18] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=12, positive) - Option A
[28, 54, 18] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=12, positive) - Option B
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [64, 18, 18] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=12, positive) - Option A
[28, 18, 54] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=12, positive) - Option C
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[28, 54, 18] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=12, positive) - Option B
✓ [28, 18, 54] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=12, positive) - Option C
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[16, 42, 42] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=12, negative) - Option A
✓ [52, 6, 42] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=12, negative) - Option B
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[16, 42, 42] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=12, negative) - Option A
✓ [52, 42, 6] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=12, negative) - Option C
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓ [52, 6, 42] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=12, negative) - Option B
[52, 42, 6] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=12, negative) - Option C

Survey ID: 117

Ideal budget: [40, 40, 20]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
16.7% 83.3% 83.3%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [45, 45, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [45, 40, 15]
Year 2: [40, 45, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [35, 35, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
✓
Year 1: [35, 40, 25]
Year 2: [40, 35, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [30, 45, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [35, 45, 20]
Year 2: [35, 40, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [50, 35, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
✓
Year 1: [45, 35, 20]
Year 2: [45, 40, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [45, 30, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 35, 25]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [35, 50, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 45, 15]
Year 2: [35, 45, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [50, 45, 5]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [40, 45, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [30, 35, 35]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
✓
Year 1: [30, 40, 30]
Year 2: [40, 35, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [25, 50, 25]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
✓
Year 1: [30, 50, 20]
Year 2: [35, 40, 25]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
✓
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [45, 40, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [45, 25, 30]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [35, 55, 10]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
✓
Year 1: [40, 50, 10]
Year 2: [35, 45, 20]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 142

Ideal budget: [35, 35, 15, 15]
⏱️ Response Time: 108s
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
l2 (Rank) 10%
leontief (Rank) 90%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[10, 45, 25, 20] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 50, 10] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[10, 40, 25, 25] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 50, 10] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [40, 10, 25, 25] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
[20, 20, 50, 10] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[45, 10, 25, 20] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[45, 10, 20, 25] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[10, 45, 25, 20] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[45, 10, 25, 20] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 50, 10] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[10, 45, 20, 25] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 50, 10] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[10, 40, 25, 25] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.38
Score = min(L2 advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[40, 10, 25, 25] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -41.23}
✓ [20, 20, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.57, worst: 0.29}

Survey ID: 181

Ideal budget: [40, 25, 25, 10]
⏱️ Response Time: 223s
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
cosine_similarity (Rank) 90%
leontief (Rank) 10%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 30, 40, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[15, 30, 35, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.65}
✓ [20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 40, 35, 10] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 25, 40, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 35, 30, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 35, 40, 10] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 40, 25, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 40, 30, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 30, 30, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.40
Score = min(Cosine Similarity advantage, Leontief advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [15, 35, 35, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.65}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}