User 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 Responses

Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 3

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Overall ConsistencyTransitivity RateOrder Consistency View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 31-03-2025 18:04 N/A [45, 30, 25] 44%100%50% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 4

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget RandomWeighted Average View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 01-04-2025 11:31 N/A [40, 35, 25] 10%90% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 103

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Overall ConsistencyTransitivity RateOrder Consistency View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 02-04-2025 16:33 N/A [50, 30, 20] 67%100%50% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 104

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget RandomWeighted Average View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 01-04-2025 11:28 N/A [50, 25, 25] 0%100% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 116

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 15-12-2025 15:18 N/A [45, 25, 30] 16.7%83.3%83.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 117

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 18-12-2025 21:26 N/A [50, 30, 20] 41.7%58.3%58.3% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 158

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget kll2 View Response
528f6c5a0... 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392 03-02-2026 18:39 N/A [35, 20, 25, 10, 10] 0%0% View Response

User ID: 528f6c5a0d552971538ef899bd604392

Extreme Vector Preferences Summary (Single User)

Note: Table summarizes user choices (12 pairs).

Consistent Inconsistent
A vs B
[80, 10, 10] vs [10, 80, 10]
33% (1) 67% (2)
A vs C
[80, 10, 10] vs [10, 10, 80]
33% (1) 67% (2)
B vs C
[10, 80, 10] vs [10, 10, 80]
67% (2) 33% (1)

Percentile Consistency Breakdown

Percentile A vs B A vs C B vs C Average Percentage
25% 0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/1) 0% (0/3)
50% 100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1) 100% (3/3)
75% 0% (0/1)0% (0/1)100% (1/1) 33% (1/3)
All Percentiles 33% (1/3)33% (1/3)67% (2/3) 44% (4/9)

Transitivity Analysis

Group Preference Order Transitivity Status
Core A>C>B Transitive
25% B>C>A Transitive
50% A>C>B Transitive
75% C>B>A Transitive
100.0%
Overall Transitivity Rate
Perfect logical consistency
50.0%
Order Consistency (Transitive Groups)
Partially stable order in transitive groups
Pairwise Consistency

This table summarizes the consistency of choices for each pair of options across all percentile groups.

Comparison PairDominant PreferenceConsistent Groups
A vs. B A>B 2/4
A vs. C A>C 2/4
B vs. C C>B 3/4

Survey ID: 3

Survey Summary
A vs B consistency: 33%
A vs C consistency: 33%
B vs C consistency: 67%
Overall Consistency: 44%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[80, 10, 10] Extreme Vector 1
[10, 80, 10] Extreme Vector 2
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[80, 10, 10] Extreme Vector 1
[10, 10, 80] Extreme Vector 3
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 80, 10] Extreme Vector 2
[10, 10, 80] Extreme Vector 3
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[54, 25, 21] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[36, 42, 22] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[54, 25, 21] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[36, 25, 39] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[36, 42, 22] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
[36, 25, 39] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[62, 20, 18] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[28, 55, 17] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[62, 20, 18] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[28, 20, 52] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[28, 55, 17] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
[28, 20, 52] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[71, 15, 14] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[19, 68, 13] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[71, 15, 14] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[19, 15, 66] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[19, 68, 13] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
[19, 15, 66] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)

Survey ID: 4

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Random 10%
Weighted Average 90%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 70] Random Vector
[16, 23, 61] Average Weighted Vector: 20%
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 55, 10] Random Vector
[36, 53, 11] Average Weighted Vector: 10%
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 50, 20] Random Vector
[35, 42, 23] Average Weighted Vector: 50%
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[25, 45, 30] Random Vector
[38, 36, 26] Average Weighted Vector: 90%
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 40] Random Vector
[32, 38, 30] Average Weighted Vector: 70%
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 40] Random Vector
[25, 41, 34] Average Weighted Vector: 40%
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[25, 30, 45] Random Vector
[32, 32, 36] Average Weighted Vector: 50%
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[65, 30, 5] Random Vector
[50, 33, 17] Average Weighted Vector: 60%
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[35, 30, 35] Random Vector
[39, 34, 27] Average Weighted Vector: 80%
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[35, 50, 15] Random Vector
[36, 46, 18] Average Weighted Vector: 30%

Extreme Vector Preferences Summary (Single User)

Note: Table summarizes user choices (12 pairs).

Consistent Inconsistent
A vs B
[80, 10, 10] vs [10, 80, 10]
33% (1) 67% (2)
A vs C
[80, 10, 10] vs [10, 10, 80]
67% (2) 33% (1)
B vs C
[10, 80, 10] vs [10, 10, 80]
100% (3) 0% (0)

Percentile Consistency Breakdown

Percentile A vs B A vs C B vs C Average Percentage
25% 0% (0/1)0% (0/1)100% (1/1) 33% (1/3)
50% 0% (0/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1) 67% (2/3)
75% 100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1) 100% (3/3)
All Percentiles 33% (1/3)67% (2/3)100% (3/3) 67% (6/9)

Transitivity Analysis

Group Preference Order Transitivity Status
Core A>B>C Transitive
25% B>C>A Transitive
50% B>A>C Transitive
75% A>B>C Transitive
100.0%
Overall Transitivity Rate
Perfect logical consistency
50.0%
Order Consistency (Transitive Groups)
Partially stable order in transitive groups
Pairwise Consistency

This table summarizes the consistency of choices for each pair of options across all percentile groups.

Comparison PairDominant PreferenceConsistent Groups
A vs. B A>B 2/4
A vs. C A>C 3/4
B vs. C B>C 4/4

Survey ID: 103

Survey Summary
A vs B consistency: 33%
A vs C consistency: 67%
B vs C consistency: 100%
Overall Consistency: 67%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[80, 10, 10] Extreme Vector 1
[10, 80, 10] Extreme Vector 2
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[80, 10, 10] Extreme Vector 1
[10, 10, 80] Extreme Vector 3
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 80, 10] Extreme Vector 2
[10, 10, 80] Extreme Vector 3
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[58, 25, 17] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[40, 42, 18] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[58, 25, 17] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[40, 25, 35] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 42, 18] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
[40, 25, 35] 25% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[65, 20, 15] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[30, 55, 15] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[65, 20, 15] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[30, 20, 50] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 55, 15] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
[30, 20, 50] 50% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[72, 15, 13] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[20, 68, 12] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[72, 15, 13] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 1)
[20, 15, 65] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[20, 68, 12] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 2)
[20, 15, 65] 75% Weighted Average (Extreme 3)

Survey ID: 104

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Random 0%
Weighted Average 100%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 50, 15] Random Vector
[38, 45, 17] Average Weighted Vector: 20%
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 15, 85] Random Vector
[20, 19, 61] Average Weighted Vector: 40%
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 40, 50] Random Vector
[38, 30, 32] Average Weighted Vector: 70%
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 0, 70] Random Vector
[42, 15, 43] Average Weighted Vector: 60%
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 35, 25] Random Vector
[45, 30, 25] Average Weighted Vector: 50%
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 60, 30] Random Vector
[30, 42, 28] Average Weighted Vector: 50%
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 30, 30] Random Vector
[48, 26, 26] Average Weighted Vector: 80%
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[25, 45, 30] Random Vector
[32, 39, 29] Average Weighted Vector: 30%
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 45, 15] Random Vector
[41, 43, 16] Average Weighted Vector: 10%
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[25, 45, 30] Random Vector
[48, 27, 25] Average Weighted Vector: 90%

Survey ID: 116

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
16.7% 83.3% 83.3%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [50, 30, 20]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
Year 1: [50, 25, 25]
Year 2: [45, 30, 25]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [40, 20, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
Year 1: [40, 25, 35]
Year 2: [45, 20, 35]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [35, 30, 35]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [40, 25, 35]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [55, 20, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [50, 25, 25]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [50, 15, 35]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
Year 1: [45, 20, 35]
Year 2: [50, 20, 30]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [40, 35, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
Year 1: [45, 30, 25]
Year 2: [40, 30, 30]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [55, 35, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
Year 1: [55, 25, 20]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [35, 15, 50]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [35, 25, 40]
Year 2: [45, 15, 40]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [25, 35, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
Year 1: [35, 35, 30]
Year 2: [35, 25, 40]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [65, 15, 20]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
Year 1: [55, 15, 30]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [55, 5, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [45, 15, 40]
Year 2: [55, 15, 30]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [35, 45, 20]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
Year 1: [45, 35, 20]
Year 2: [35, 35, 30]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 117

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
41.7% 58.3% 58.3%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [55, 35, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
Year 1: [55, 30, 15]
Year 2: [50, 35, 15]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [45, 25, 30]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
Year 1: [45, 30, 25]
Year 2: [50, 25, 25]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [40, 35, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [45, 35, 20]
Year 2: [45, 30, 25]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [60, 25, 15]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
Year 1: [55, 25, 20]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [55, 20, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
Year 1: [50, 25, 25]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [45, 40, 15]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
Year 1: [50, 35, 15]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [60, 35, 5]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
Year 1: [60, 30, 10]
Year 2: [50, 35, 15]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [40, 25, 35]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [50, 25, 25]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [35, 40, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
Year 1: [40, 40, 20]
Year 2: [45, 30, 25]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [65, 20, 15]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [55, 15, 30]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [55, 25, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [45, 45, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 158

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
kl (Rank) 0%
l2 (Rank) 100%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 10, 55, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.24, worst: -0.30}
[10, 15, 30, 30, 15] l2: {best: -33.17, worst: -37.42}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 50, 15, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.24, worst: -0.31}
[10, 20, 20, 25, 25] l2: {best: -33.17, worst: -37.42}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 20, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.19, worst: -0.25}
[10, 20, 30, 20, 20] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -32.40}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 15, 50, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.18, worst: -0.24}
[30, 10, 10, 30, 20] l2: {best: -29.15, worst: -32.40}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[20, 45, 15, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.16, worst: -0.22}
[35, 10, 10, 30, 15] l2: {best: -27.39, worst: -30.82}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[20, 10, 50, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.16, worst: -0.22}
[35, 10, 10, 15, 30] l2: {best: -27.39, worst: -30.82}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[20, 50, 10, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.24, worst: -0.29}
[10, 15, 30, 20, 25] l2: {best: -31.62, worst: -36.74}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 10, 50, 10, 15] kl: {best: -0.22, worst: -0.28}
[10, 20, 25, 20, 25] l2: {best: -30.82, worst: -33.91}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 10, 50, 15, 10] kl: {best: -0.22, worst: -0.27}
[10, 30, 20, 20, 20] l2: {best: -30.82, worst: -33.91}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 15, 15, 10] kl: {best: -0.22, worst: -0.27}
[10, 15, 35, 20, 20] l2: {best: -30.82, worst: -33.91}