עברית English

User 300d511093cafb07ef9931a67720671a Responses

← Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 116

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
300d51109... 300d511093cafb07ef9931a67720671a 15-07-2026 18:03 63s [50, 40, 10] 100%0%100% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 128

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget leontiefkl View Response
300d51109... 300d511093cafb07ef9931a67720671a 04-02-2026 15:29 N/A [50, 0, 0, 50] 0%0% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 171

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Identity ConsistencyPreferred Subject View Response
300d51109... 300d511093cafb07ef9931a67720671a 09-02-2026 12:43 N/A [50, 0, 0, 50, 0] 100%Ministry of Defense View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 179

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
300d51109... 300d511093cafb07ef9931a67720671a 20-07-2026 19:14 69s [50, 0, 0, 50] 0%0%0% View Response

User ID: 300d511093cafb07ef9931a67720671a

Survey ID: 116

Ideal budget: [50, 40, 10]
⏱️ Response Time: 63s

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Concentrated
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [55, 45, 0]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
Year 1: [55, 40, 5]
Year 2: [50, 45, 5]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [45, 35, 20]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
Year 1: [45, 40, 15]
Year 2: [50, 35, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [40, 45, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [45, 45, 10]
Year 2: [45, 40, 15]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [60, 35, 5]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
Year 1: [55, 35, 10]
Year 2: [55, 40, 5]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
Year 1: [50, 35, 15]
Year 2: [55, 35, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [45, 50, 5]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
Year 1: [50, 45, 5]
Year 2: [45, 45, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [52, 44, 4]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
Year 1: [52, 40, 8]
Year 2: [50, 44, 6]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [48, 36, 16]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [48, 40, 12]
Year 2: [50, 36, 14]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [44, 42, 14]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
Year 1: [48, 42, 10]
Year 2: [46, 40, 14]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [56, 38, 6]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
Year 1: [52, 38, 10]
Year 2: [54, 40, 6]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [54, 34, 12]
 Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 38, 12]
Year 2: [54, 36, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
✓
Year 1: [50, 40, 10]
Year 2: [46, 46, 8]
 Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 42, 8]
Year 2: [46, 44, 10]
 Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 128

Ideal budget: [50, 0, 0, 50]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
leontief (Rank) 30%
kl (Rank) 70%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.25
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 50, 10, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
[10, 0, 0, 90] kl: {best: -0.51, worst: -0.92}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.25
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 10, 50, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [90, 0, 0, 10] kl: {best: -0.51, worst: -0.92}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.22
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 45, 15, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [85, 5, 0, 10] kl: {best: -0.54, worst: -0.92}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.22
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 35, 25, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [85, 0, 5, 10] kl: {best: -0.54, worst: -0.92}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.22
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 15, 45, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
[10, 0, 5, 85] kl: {best: -0.54, worst: -0.92}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.22
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
✓ [20, 20, 40, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
[10, 5, 0, 85] kl: {best: -0.54, worst: -0.92}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.21
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 5, 55, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [10, 10, 0, 80] kl: {best: -0.57, worst: -0.92}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Pair Score: 0.21
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 25, 35, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [80, 10, 0, 10] kl: {best: -0.57, worst: -0.92}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.21
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 0, 60, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [80, 0, 10, 10] kl: {best: -0.57, worst: -0.92}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Pair Score: 0.21
Score = min(Leontief advantage, KL advantage). Advantage = how much better one vector is than the other in each metric. Higher score = clearer choice.
Choice Option Type
[20, 30, 30, 20] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
✓ [10, 0, 10, 80] kl: {best: -0.57, worst: -0.92}

Identity Asymmetry Analysis

Identity Consistency: 100.0%

Dominant Preference: Ministry of Defense

Pain Curve
Step Magnitude Preferred Subject
1 5 Ministry of Defense
2 10 Ministry of Defense
3 15 Ministry of Defense
4 20 Ministry of Defense
5 25 Ministry of Defense
6 30 Ministry of Defense
7 35 Ministry of Defense
8 40 Ministry of Defense
9 45 Ministry of Defense
10 50 Ministry of Defense

Survey ID: 171

Ideal budget: [50, 0, 0, 50, 0]
⏱️ Response Time: N/A
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[45, 0, 0, 55, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [55, 0, 0, 45, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 0, 0, 60, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [60, 0, 0, 40, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 0, 0, 65, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [65, 0, 0, 35, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[30, 0, 0, 70, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [70, 0, 0, 30, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[25, 0, 0, 75, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [75, 0, 0, 25, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[20, 0, 0, 80, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [80, 0, 0, 20, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 0, 0, 85, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [85, 0, 0, 15, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 0, 0, 90, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [90, 0, 0, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[5, 0, 0, 95, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [95, 0, 0, 5, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[0, 0, 0, 100, 0] מעדיף את משרד הרווחה
✓ [100, 0, 0, 0, 0] מעדיף את משרד הביטחון

Survey ID: 179

Ideal budget: [50, 0, 0, 50]
⏱️ Response Time: 69s

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Distributed
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 5, 10, 85] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.70, worst: 0.60}
✓ [45, 45, 0, 10] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 5, 10, 85] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.70, worst: 0.58}
✓ [50, 0, 45, 5] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 5, 10, 85] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.70, worst: 0.60}
✓ [50, 5, 40, 5] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[0, 5, 10, 85] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.70, worst: 0.60}
✓ [45, 0, 45, 10] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 0, 0, 100] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.60}
✓ [45, 0, 45, 10] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[0, 0, 0, 100] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.71, worst: 0.63}
✓ [15, 45, 0, 40] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[20, 15, 35, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.67, worst: 0.58}
✓ [50, 0, 45, 5] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[20, 15, 35, 30] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.67, worst: 0.58}
✓ [50, 45, 0, 5] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 15, 35, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.67, worst: 0.58}
✓ [50, 0, 45, 5] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 15, 35, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.67, worst: 0.58}
✓ [50, 45, 0, 5] l1: {best: -90.00, worst: -100.00}