User 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 Responses

Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 4

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget RandomWeighted Average View Response
2cb079918... 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 09-02-2025 11:05 N/A [30, 10, 60] 10%90% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 5

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget RandomWeighted Average View Response
2cb079918... 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 09-02-2025 12:13 N/A [40, 20, 40] 20%80% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 116

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Concentrated ChangeDistributed ChangeTriangle Inequality Consistency View Response
2cb079918... 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 15-12-2025 15:10 N/A [50, 20, 30] 75%25%75% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 145

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget l2leontief View Response
2cb079918... 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 30-03-2026 20:33 N/A [50, 10, 20, 10, 10] 0%0% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 154

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget kll2 View Response
2cb079918... 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 28-01-2026 12:09 N/A [50, 20, 30] 0%0% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 171

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Identity ConsistencyPreferred Subject View Response
2cb079918... 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248 09-02-2026 13:11 N/A [50, 20, 20, 10, 0] 50%- View Response

User ID: 2cb079918e4d970dbefc4aa22b272248

Survey ID: 4

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Random 10%
Weighted Average 90%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[30, 35, 35] Random Vector
[30, 12, 58] Average Weighted Vector: 90%
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 75, 15] Random Vector
[20, 42, 38] Average Weighted Vector: 50%
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 40, 20] Random Vector
[35, 25, 40] Average Weighted Vector: 50%
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[45, 20, 35] Random Vector
[39, 16, 45] Average Weighted Vector: 40%
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 35, 50] Random Vector
[27, 15, 58] Average Weighted Vector: 80%
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 30, 40] Random Vector
[30, 24, 46] Average Weighted Vector: 30%
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 50, 50] Random Vector
[6, 42, 52] Average Weighted Vector: 20%
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[25, 45, 30] Random Vector
[28, 20, 52] Average Weighted Vector: 70%
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 15, 70] Random Vector
[16, 14, 70] Average Weighted Vector: 10%
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[40, 10, 50] Random Vector
[34, 10, 56] Average Weighted Vector: 60%

Survey ID: 5

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Random 20%
Weighted Average 80%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 40] Random Vector
[30, 30, 40] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 50%
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 35, 25] Random Vector
[40, 30, 30] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 20%
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[60, 10, 30] Random Vector
[50, 15, 35] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 70%
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[45, 15, 40] Random Vector
[40, 20, 40] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 80%
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 65, 20] Random Vector
[20, 55, 25] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 30%
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 35, 55] Random Vector
[20, 30, 50] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 40%
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[25, 15, 60] Random Vector
[35, 20, 45] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 60%
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 35, 50] Random Vector
[20, 35, 45] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 10%
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[90, 5, 5] Random Vector
[45, 20, 35] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 90%
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 30, 40] Random Vector
[35, 25, 40] Rounded Weighted Average Vector: 50%

Survey ID: 116

Triangle Inequality Analysis

This table shows the user's preferences between concentrated changes (all change in one year) versus distributed changes (changes across both years).

Prefers Concentrated
Concentrated Change Distributed Change User Consistency
75.0% 25.0% 75.0%
Pairs List
ℹ️
Group (G1/G2) = Two different budget change scenarios
Rotation (R0/R1/R2) = Cyclic rotation of affected categories
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [55, 30, 15]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R0
Year 1: [55, 20, 25]
Year 2: [50, 30, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R0
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [45, 10, 45]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R0
Year 1: [45, 20, 35]
Year 2: [50, 10, 40]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R0
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [35, 25, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R1
Year 1: [45, 25, 30]
Year 2: [40, 20, 40]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R1
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [65, 15, 20]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R1
Year 1: [55, 15, 30]
Year 2: [60, 20, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R1
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [60, 5, 35]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G1 R2
Year 1: [50, 15, 35]
Year 2: [60, 10, 30]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G1 R2
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [40, 35, 25]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G1 R2
Year 1: [50, 25, 25]
Year 2: [40, 30, 30]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G1 R2
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [60, 30, 10]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R0
Year 1: [60, 20, 20]
Year 2: [50, 30, 20]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R0
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [40, 10, 50]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R0
Year 1: [40, 20, 40]
Year 2: [50, 10, 40]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R0
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [30, 30, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R1
Year 1: [40, 30, 30]
Year 2: [40, 20, 40]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R1
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [70, 10, 20]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R1
Year 1: [60, 10, 30]
Year 2: [60, 20, 20]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R1
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [60, 0, 40]
Triangle Concentrated (+) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 10, 40]
Year 2: [60, 10, 30]
Triangle Distributed (+) - G2 R2
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
Year 1: [50, 20, 30]
Year 2: [40, 40, 20]
Triangle Concentrated (-) - G2 R2
Year 1: [50, 30, 20]
Year 2: [40, 30, 30]
Triangle Distributed (-) - G2 R2

Survey ID: 145

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
l2 (Rank) 0%
leontief (Rank) 100%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 30, 20, 20] l2: {best: -44.72, worst: -50.99}
[20, 50, 10, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 30, 20, 20] l2: {best: -44.72, worst: -50.99}
[20, 10, 10, 50, 10] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 30, 20, 20] l2: {best: -44.72, worst: -50.99}
[20, 10, 10, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.40, worst: 0.20}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 30, 25, 15] l2: {best: -45.28, worst: -51.48}
[15, 45, 10, 10, 20] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 35, 10, 25] l2: {best: -46.37, worst: -53.39}
[15, 10, 15, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 35, 10, 25] l2: {best: -46.37, worst: -57.88}
[15, 10, 10, 55, 10] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 20, 35, 10, 25] l2: {best: -46.37, worst: -54.31}
[15, 10, 10, 50, 15] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 15, 35, 20, 20] l2: {best: -45.28, worst: -53.39}
[15, 50, 15, 10, 10] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[10, 15, 35, 20, 20] l2: {best: -45.28, worst: -54.31}
[15, 50, 10, 15, 10] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[10, 15, 35, 20, 20] l2: {best: -45.28, worst: -54.31}
[15, 50, 10, 10, 15] leontief: {best: 0.30, worst: 0.20}

Survey ID: 154

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
kl (Rank) 40%
l2 (Rank) 60%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[30, 15, 55] kl: {best: -0.13, worst: -0.17}
[55, 35, 10] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -32.40}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[30, 20, 50] kl: {best: -0.10, worst: -0.16}
[60, 30, 10] l2: {best: -24.49, worst: -28.28}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[25, 25, 50] kl: {best: -0.15, worst: -0.19}
[50, 40, 10] l2: {best: -28.28, worst: -32.40}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 15, 70] kl: {best: -0.41, worst: -0.52}
[10, 45, 45] l2: {best: -49.50, worst: -53.39}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[20, 60, 20] kl: {best: -0.36, worst: -0.51}
[10, 40, 50] l2: {best: -48.99, worst: -50.99}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[20, 65, 15] kl: {best: -0.43, worst: -0.54}
[10, 50, 40] l2: {best: -50.99, worst: -56.12}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 65, 20] kl: {best: -0.49, worst: -0.56}
[10, 55, 35] l2: {best: -53.39, worst: -57.88}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 20, 45] kl: {best: -0.06, worst: -0.08}
[55, 30, 15] l2: {best: -18.71, worst: -21.21}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 10, 55] kl: {best: -0.14, worst: -0.15}
[65, 25, 10] l2: {best: -25.50, worst: -30.82}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[35, 15, 50] kl: {best: -0.08, worst: -0.10}
[40, 10, 50] l2: {best: -24.49, worst: -25.50}

Identity Asymmetry Analysis

Identity Consistency: 50.0%

Dominant Preference: -

Pain Curve
Step Magnitude Preferred Subject
1 2 Ministry of Education
2 4 Ministry of Education
3 6 Ministry of Health
4 8 Ministry of Health
5 10 Ministry of Education
6 12 Ministry of Health
7 14 Ministry of Education
8 16 Ministry of Health
9 18 Ministry of Health
10 20 Ministry of Education

Survey ID: 171

Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 18, 22, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 22, 18, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 16, 24, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 24, 16, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 14, 26, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 26, 14, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 12, 28, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 28, 12, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 10, 30, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 30, 10, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 8, 32, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 32, 8, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 6, 34, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 34, 6, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 4, 36, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 36, 4, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[50, 2, 38, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 38, 2, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[50, 0, 40, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד הבריאות
[50, 40, 0, 10, 0] מעדיף את משרד החינוך