User 0fb66d8cc59f07328fe336b0731d985f Responses

Back to Responses List

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 112

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Consistency View Response
0fb66d8cc... 0fb66d8cc59f07328fe336b0731d985f 25-09-2025 12:53 N/A [50, 25, 25] 100% View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 172

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget Identity ConsistencyPreferred Subject View Response
0fb66d8cc... 0fb66d8cc59f07328fe336b0731d985f 09-02-2026 15:08 N/A [35, 30, 35] 70%Education institutes View Response

Survey Response Breakdown - Survey 181

User ID Submitted At Duration Ideal budget cosine_similarityleontief View Response
0fb66d8cc... 0fb66d8cc59f07328fe336b0731d985f 26-07-2026 11:51 151s [40, 25, 20, 15] 0%0% View Response

User ID: 0fb66d8cc59f07328fe336b0731d985f

User Preference Consistency Analysis

Table: Preference A vs B
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 B > A B > A
Magnitude 0.4 B > A B > A
Col. Cons. Final Score: 1
Table: Preference A vs C
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 C > A C > A
Magnitude 0.4 C > A C > A
Col. Cons. Final Score: 1
Table: Preference B vs C
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude 0.2 B > C B > C
Magnitude 0.4 B > C B > C
Col. Cons. Final Score: 1
Final Ranking Summary Table
Question + Question – Row Consistency
Magnitude X1=5 B > C > A B > C > A 3/3
Magnitude X2=10 B > C > A B > C > A 3/3
Col. Cons. 3/3 3/3 3/3
Understanding Consistency Scores

This analysis measures how consistently the user ranks the same budget subjects across different scenarios. Perfect consistency (✓) means the user always ranks subjects the same way (3/3). Partial consistency (◐) means the user shows consistency in some scenarios but varies in others (1/3 or 2/3). Failed consistency (✗) means the user's rankings vary significantly (0/3). Note: In questions with negative magnitude (Question –), user preferences are swapped to reflect the true meaning of their choices.

Perfect Consistency
Partial Consistency
Inconsistent

Survey ID: 112

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
Option A 50%
Option B 50%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[60, 20, 20] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=5, positive) - Option A
[45, 35, 20] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=5, positive) - Option B
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[60, 20, 20] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=5, positive) - Option A
[45, 20, 35] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=5, positive) - Option C
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[45, 35, 20] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=5, positive) - Option B
[45, 20, 35] Preference Ranking Q1 (mag=5, positive) - Option C
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 30, 30] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=5, negative) - Option A
[55, 15, 30] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=5, negative) - Option B
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 30, 30] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=5, negative) - Option A
[55, 30, 15] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=5, negative) - Option C
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[55, 15, 30] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=5, negative) - Option B
[55, 30, 15] Preference Ranking Q2 (mag=5, negative) - Option C
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[70, 15, 15] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=10, positive) - Option A
[40, 45, 15] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=10, positive) - Option B
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[70, 15, 15] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=10, positive) - Option A
[40, 15, 45] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=10, positive) - Option C
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[40, 45, 15] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=10, positive) - Option B
[40, 15, 45] Preference Ranking Q4 (mag=10, positive) - Option C
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[30, 35, 35] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=10, negative) - Option A
[60, 5, 35] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=10, negative) - Option B
Pair #11
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[30, 35, 35] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=10, negative) - Option A
[60, 35, 5] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=10, negative) - Option C
Pair #12
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[60, 5, 35] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=10, negative) - Option B
[60, 35, 5] Preference Ranking Q5 (mag=10, negative) - Option C

Identity Asymmetry Analysis

Identity Consistency: 70.0%

Dominant Preference: Education institutes

Pain Curve
Step Magnitude Preferred Subject
1 4 Cultural events
2 7 Education institutes
3 10 Education institutes
4 14 Education institutes
5 18 Education institutes
6 21 Cultural events
7 24 Education institutes
8 28 Cultural events
9 32 Education institutes
10 35 Education institutes

Survey ID: 172

Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[31, 30, 39] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[39, 30, 31] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[28, 30, 42] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[42, 30, 28] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[25, 30, 45] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[45, 30, 25] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[21, 30, 49] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[49, 30, 21] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[17, 30, 53] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[53, 30, 17] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[14, 30, 56] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[56, 30, 14] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[11, 30, 59] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[59, 30, 11] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[7, 30, 63] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[63, 30, 7] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[3, 30, 67] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[67, 30, 3] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[0, 30, 70] מעדיף את אירועי תרבות
[70, 30, 0] מעדיף את מוסדות חינוך

Survey ID: 181

Survey Summary
Choice Percentage
cosine_similarity (Rank) 100%
leontief (Rank) 0%
Pairs List
Pair #1
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 40, 25, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #2
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 40, 20, 25] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.83, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #3
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 35, 35, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.83, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #4
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 35, 30, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.72}
[20, 15, 15, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #5
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 20, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.82, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #6
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 40, 35, 10] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.82, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #7
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 35, 30, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #8
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 35, 30, 20] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.85, worst: 0.72}
[20, 20, 10, 50] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #9
Original choice: Option 1
Choice Option Type
[15, 40, 30, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.84, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}
Pair #10
Original choice: Option 2
Choice Option Type
[15, 45, 25, 15] cosine_similarity: {best: 0.82, worst: 0.67}
[20, 15, 10, 55] leontief: {best: 0.50, worst: 0.38}